Law students reach finals in sports moot

Law students reach finals in sports moot

October 30, 2024 at 3:08 pm  Education, Kamloops, News

A team of TRU Law students came in fourth place at the National Sports Law Negotiation Competition. The competition took place from Oct. 18–20 in San Diego, Calif. TRU Law sent two teams of two this year: Luke Conkin and Brynn Pedlow, and Sarah Andrusky and Neelam Jassal. Conkin and Pedlow made the final round and finished fourth overall.

TRU Law is the only Canadian team that competes at this sports law competition. This year’s team was coached by TRU Law alumni Karen Perry and Imogen Jenkins. Perry had competed in the NSLNC herself.

The competition required teams to negotiate two preliminary rounds. Both rounds focused the settlement of a real-life complaint by University of Oregon beach volleyball players, alleging disparate treatment in facilities and in “name, image and likeness” opportunities. Andrusky and Jassal found it incredibly rewarding to address issues of gender equality in sports while gaining practical experience in negotiation.

After preparing for a couple of months, the teams went to San Diego. The preparation paid off. After Conkin’s and Pedlow’s first round, one of the judges said: “This is terrible, terrible for every other team here. This is the best performance I have ever seen. Straight business from the beginning.”

Conkin’s and Pedlow’s performance sent them to the finals, TRU Law’s best showing at the competition.

Conkin and Pedlow prepared on Saturday night for a new negotiation — the departure of a sports agent from their agency. Coach Perry was proud of how both teams pulled together to prepare for the finals.

“It really was a collaborative team effort,” she said.

The team worked so hard, they called Prof. Ryan Gauthier at 10:55 p.m. for a quick pep talk and to ask questions. They negotiated well on Sunday, demonstrating that they belonged in the finals. At the end of the day, Conkin and Pedlow walked away with a fourth-overall finish among the 40 teams at the competition.

Reflecting on their experience, the fourth-place finishers highlighted their approach of actually listening to what the other party has to say to understand their interests, and proposing solutions that are mutually beneficial. They also pointed out that they were willing to be clear and assertive when necessary.

Financial support for the team to go to San Diego came from the TRU Students’ Union and the Dr. Sherman Jen Innovation Competition Prize.

View Link to Original Source

No conversations yet

Activity Stream

Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 8:00 am - David Suzuki posted on their blog: The burning issue of fossil-fuelled Scope 3 emissions
Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 8:00 am - David Suzuki posted on their blog: Like it or not, we can’t live without insects
Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 3:11 pm - Darryl Schmidt posted a comment on Are Union Construction Sites Safer? Where’s the Proof?
Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 3:08 pm - Darryl Schmidt posted on their blog: Are Union Construction Sites Safer? Where’s the Proof?
Thu, Jun 19, 2025 at 8:00 am - David Suzuki posted on their blog: End times or turning point? It’s our choice
Thu, Jun 12, 2025 at 8:00 am - David Suzuki posted on their blog: Economic denial slows crucial climate progress
Thu, Jun 5, 2025 at 8:00 am - David Suzuki posted on their blog: A climate-safe future demands the defeat of ignorance
Fri, May 30, 2025 at 8:03 pm - Kamloops Film Society posted on their blog: The Lord of the Rings – The Kamloops Film Society
Thu, May 29, 2025 at 8:00 am - David Suzuki posted on their blog: Put away pipelines, go with grids!
Full Stream